Soundbite snark. Pick one. Pick 'em all.
There's a webcomics site on which women and girls will find things to read! There's a line of girl's books! OMG! DC made it to the 21st century (following in the wake of GirlAMatic.com and Viz) only nearly a decade in!
ETA: Oh, lolcomics, you are like P.O.O.P.: you never let us down!

And it's called Zuda. Whatever that means.
ETA: DC, carrying on its fine tradition of naming comics lines with names already used (Femme Noir, Minx), has used the name of a artist , ZUDA, as the name of its webcomics line. At least this time its not the name of an existing comic.
(ETA: That was pointed out by Matt M. at The Beat. Sorry about neglecting to link, Matt!)
I bet the name "Zuda" came from the same Alloy Scrabble tile bag as Jetix and Meguzi. Considering that DC's girl's line (inspired by Shelley Bond seeing girls reading manga and then deciding to do books NOTHING LIKE MANGA) was named "Minx," we should all be grateful Zuda isn't called "Smeg."

What Heidi calls the punditocracy is saying things much like what I said about TokyoPop contracts well over two years ago. To wit: this smells, and creators should beware. If you think this is a great opportunity, and all the other wah-wah I heard about TP two years ago, have fun. Don't try to defend it here.
You know, I think I'm pretty funny, but the Zuda fact sheet is much, much funnier. Let's look, shall we?
"Zuda Comics will be all-new, original comics made specifically for the web."
It's new! These comicwebbies!
"Not only that, but the majority of comics we publish will be selected by the Zuda community...The one you guys like the best is the one we'll sign up for a one-year contract."
Hey, DC! Does this mean you'll poach from Zuda, your own site, instead of from Oni and Slave Labor and other establlished webcomcis sites? Are you in a plan like TokyoPop, which is to find hungry, ignorant and in-denial creators looking for their Big Break?
How is it that Platinum and TP beat you to the "have a contest in the barn and get a winner so excited about validation they'll pretend they don't see the mouse print " bandwagon?"
"We're giving away postcards at the San Diego Comic Con in order to make a giant collaborative Web Comic."
I bet the "by submitting, you give us all rights throughout the known universe in all forms of media current or yet to be created" boilerplate on the reverse of that postcard is smaller than the type on the back of a lottery ticket.

"We're using a lot of open source technologies to build the final Zuda Comics site. That's just how we roll."
I'll be over here, in the corner, in a fetal position, seeing how long I laugh before that rib I cracked at APE in 2004 breaks again.
" Every artist needs to work on a page, even if it's a digital one. Yeah, we weren't sure just what that meant either"
Maybe you should've launched when you had a site, then.
"...so we did a lot of work to figure that out. Our page had to work on screen and, eventually, in print and it had to work for single panels, strips and pages. [Dave] came up with this complex formula that resulted in an aspect ratio that worked for everything - 4:3. Turns out, it's an industry standard. "
The? Fuck?
You know, there was a panel on webcomics in 1997 at the long-gone pro/Con. Scott McCloud hosted it. Attending this panel were any number of comics pros, including Kurt Busiek and Chris Claremont. Claremont had cast himself in the role of naysayer, again and again giving reasons webcomics wouldn't work. He would write down his statements on a legal pad, and shout them out when there was an opportunity.
The panel eventually ended, and I met up with Kurt and Ann Busiek outside, and discussed Claremont's combativeness. Kurt had been reading Claremont's legal pad over his shoulder.
"He didn't get to my favorite point," said Kurt.
"What was that?" I asked.
"'Comics pages wrong size for computer screen.'"
"Every artist needs to work on a page, even if it's a digital one. Yeah, we weren't sure just what that meant either so we did a lot of work to figure that out."
This is dissembling. Gosh-darn we're new here too dissembling. Gosh-darn we're you're buddies we'd never ask you to sign away anything that'd hurt ya! We're pals! Here, have a few pomegranate seeds!

"You make the web comics and send them to us for publication."
This whole Zuda things smells of "Webcomics! How hard could it be to run an electronic slushpile? How hard can it be to run a webcomics site? There's no print prep, people submit, the readers 'vet,' we sit back and pick what we want."
How hard are webcomics sites to run? I can answer that, having launched a site (amongst great hostility to the idea of a girl- and woman-friendly portal) and running it for two years: very hard, if you want the work to appear, you want creators who can sustain over a period of time, you can deal with the anger of being poached and creators forgetting they started with you, the editor's work to be transparent, and the reader's experience seamless.
Ask Warren Ellis. Rocket Pirates, anyone?
Back when Summer was a baby, I was approached by an editor of Mondo 2000 at a party. Fresh off a hit of wacky tabaccy, she asked me me if I was interested in doing a manga for Mondo.
"What's the pay," I asked.
She answered in a voice constricted and gravelled from smoke, "We...pay in...acclaim."
A final thought, to go with all the warnings:

There's a webcomics site on which women and girls will find things to read! There's a line of girl's books! OMG! DC made it to the 21st century (following in the wake of GirlAMatic.com and Viz) only nearly a decade in!
ETA: Oh, lolcomics, you are like P.O.O.P.: you never let us down!

And it's called Zuda. Whatever that means.
ETA: DC, carrying on its fine tradition of naming comics lines with names already used (Femme Noir, Minx), has used the name of a artist , ZUDA, as the name of its webcomics line. At least this time its not the name of an existing comic.
(ETA: That was pointed out by Matt M. at The Beat. Sorry about neglecting to link, Matt!)
I bet the name "Zuda" came from the same Alloy Scrabble tile bag as Jetix and Meguzi. Considering that DC's girl's line (inspired by Shelley Bond seeing girls reading manga and then deciding to do books NOTHING LIKE MANGA) was named "Minx," we should all be grateful Zuda isn't called "Smeg."

What Heidi calls the punditocracy is saying things much like what I said about TokyoPop contracts well over two years ago. To wit: this smells, and creators should beware. If you think this is a great opportunity, and all the other wah-wah I heard about TP two years ago, have fun. Don't try to defend it here.
You know, I think I'm pretty funny, but the Zuda fact sheet is much, much funnier. Let's look, shall we?
"Zuda Comics will be all-new, original comics made specifically for the web."
It's new! These comicwebbies!
"Not only that, but the majority of comics we publish will be selected by the Zuda community...The one you guys like the best is the one we'll sign up for a one-year contract."
Hey, DC! Does this mean you'll poach from Zuda, your own site, instead of from Oni and Slave Labor and other establlished webcomcis sites? Are you in a plan like TokyoPop, which is to find hungry, ignorant and in-denial creators looking for their Big Break?
How is it that Platinum and TP beat you to the "have a contest in the barn and get a winner so excited about validation they'll pretend they don't see the mouse print " bandwagon?"
"We're giving away postcards at the San Diego Comic Con in order to make a giant collaborative Web Comic."
I bet the "by submitting, you give us all rights throughout the known universe in all forms of media current or yet to be created" boilerplate on the reverse of that postcard is smaller than the type on the back of a lottery ticket.

"We're using a lot of open source technologies to build the final Zuda Comics site. That's just how we roll."
I'll be over here, in the corner, in a fetal position, seeing how long I laugh before that rib I cracked at APE in 2004 breaks again.
" Every artist needs to work on a page, even if it's a digital one. Yeah, we weren't sure just what that meant either"
Maybe you should've launched when you had a site, then.
"...so we did a lot of work to figure that out. Our page had to work on screen and, eventually, in print and it had to work for single panels, strips and pages. [Dave] came up with this complex formula that resulted in an aspect ratio that worked for everything - 4:3. Turns out, it's an industry standard. "
The? Fuck?
You know, there was a panel on webcomics in 1997 at the long-gone pro/Con. Scott McCloud hosted it. Attending this panel were any number of comics pros, including Kurt Busiek and Chris Claremont. Claremont had cast himself in the role of naysayer, again and again giving reasons webcomics wouldn't work. He would write down his statements on a legal pad, and shout them out when there was an opportunity.
The panel eventually ended, and I met up with Kurt and Ann Busiek outside, and discussed Claremont's combativeness. Kurt had been reading Claremont's legal pad over his shoulder.
"He didn't get to my favorite point," said Kurt.
"What was that?" I asked.
"'Comics pages wrong size for computer screen.'"
"Every artist needs to work on a page, even if it's a digital one. Yeah, we weren't sure just what that meant either so we did a lot of work to figure that out."
This is dissembling. Gosh-darn we're new here too dissembling. Gosh-darn we're you're buddies we'd never ask you to sign away anything that'd hurt ya! We're pals! Here, have a few pomegranate seeds!

"You make the web comics and send them to us for publication."
This whole Zuda things smells of "Webcomics! How hard could it be to run an electronic slushpile? How hard can it be to run a webcomics site? There's no print prep, people submit, the readers 'vet,' we sit back and pick what we want."
How hard are webcomics sites to run? I can answer that, having launched a site (amongst great hostility to the idea of a girl- and woman-friendly portal) and running it for two years: very hard, if you want the work to appear, you want creators who can sustain over a period of time, you can deal with the anger of being poached and creators forgetting they started with you, the editor's work to be transparent, and the reader's experience seamless.
Ask Warren Ellis. Rocket Pirates, anyone?
Back when Summer was a baby, I was approached by an editor of Mondo 2000 at a party. Fresh off a hit of wacky tabaccy, she asked me me if I was interested in doing a manga for Mondo.
"What's the pay," I asked.
She answered in a voice constricted and gravelled from smoke, "We...pay in...acclaim."
A final thought, to go with all the warnings:



Comments
We should start a betting pool--how long it takes 'til either the site fizzles, or there's a nonpayment / rights scandal.
I'm so confused.
By the way, that's a twisted icon you have there...
Sweet fancy Jesus!
Lady, most supermarkets do not accept acclaim in exchange for goods. Come back when you've at least got food stamps or something.
I was doing illustration for a while, and stopped because I got so bloody sick of this "argument." I'm now doing metalwork, and what I say to people is that if anyone takes my stuff now and argues that "gold wants to be free!" I can call the cops on them- as was NOT true of my illustration work. *eyeroll*
I am perfectly happy to donate my work- as long as I have guaranteed food, clothing, shelter, studio and materials. Wait- I have to PAY for all these? Well, then, I guess I have to CHARGE for my efforts!
It's complicated...
My point in the story is, it wasn't cute with a 14-year-old kid, and it certainly isn't cute with an international business.
Really I think it's going to get interesting if the guys on Penny Arcade decide to jump on this one, considering they once did sell the rights to their comic without realizing it.
Not that DC would ever exploit naive creators like that of course. *whistles*
No, the kid was just a goober who didn't really get ideas like "copyright infringement" or "creator's rights" or even "basic supply and demand". He was just having a greed overload, which is normal for a naive kid. Wasn't all that attractive, so I have always tried to keep my greed under control... at least in public. ^_^
Essentially the trick is not like that pulled by bigger companies all the time. At the end of the 90s/early 2000s the big thing I remember was "Royalty Free Clipart" (artists get paid a one time fee... if that, company sells the CDs indefinitely).
That DC Comics says they want to enter a "complicated" agreement over Intellectual properties says to me that anyone signing should be very wary of exactly what they're agreeing to.
Webcomics (or iPhone comics or whatever) is the future, and it's a future with no overhead, no specialised external suppliers. We get rid of the printers, we get rid of the distributors, and we get rid of the professional artists. There's an endless supply out there in the US of A (better avoid Europe where they have these weird ideas about the individual rights of creators and avoid also the rest of the world where they have a scandalous treatment of copy protection) of kids living with their parents or in college dorms and some of them are bound to do trendy, attractive strips.
The only real cost is moving pixels and there are thousands of competitive Web page design/maintenance companies and corporate ISPs we can deal with or throw away when it suits us. This the millenium of business deals and it's time for comics to move out of the craft world and into business.
"I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a happy meal today."
-take away my rights
-not promote my work
-not publish my work
Like say, some companies do. I'm free to do whatever I want with my work.
As someone who's been working in the industry for 2 decades, and has experienced and seen a fair amount of craziness, I think it's unfair of you to criticize her for pointing out this kind of stuff. It's not like she's Random Mary Sue/Larry Stew, Obsessive Fandom Blogger.
And just because you weren't swindled, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. There's nothing wrong with educating artists, and making them aware of stuff companies usually tend to brush over.
"Two, I don't know shit about the Tokyopop thing"
Then before you rant, please research. I don't feel like doing it for you. I could, but I mean, it's not that hard to use google.
"but did it ever occur to you that the excitement wasn't about validation, but the opportunity for me to make a living drawing comics, and contrary to your belief, actually control and steer my own creation with Platinum as a business partner? "
An opportunity for to make a living drawing comics does = Validation. It means your talents are recognized, and you can now spend your time doing what you love, and make some money for it. And I'm not saying one can't have a good relation with their publisher or editor- that does happen. But sometimes people have no idea what they're getting into. Sometimes they do. Sometimes management can change. Sometimes it all works out perfectly, and an artist stays with said company for years. Sometimes they run away screaming to whoever offers them the best deal. All kinds of things can happen.
I'm not saying I'd never make a shared rights choice, it would depend on the situation, but I know that it's best to educate yourself as much as possible, and if there is something really overboard, it never hurts to point it out to the enchanted masses. Comics isn't all rainbow flavored nutmeg puppy pies.
And fyi- MT creators were considered professionals by San Diego Comic Con. It's not like DC is the only professional webcomics publisher. There's quite a few- Keenspot and WirePop for example.
As far as her working for two decades, I don't care if it was five decades, it doesn't mean you're always right-- it's still fair for me to point out how she's wrong in what she typed regarding Platinum's contest.
Do people get screwed over? Every day. I'm not one of them.
But this isn't the thing. In fact, this just pushes me to continue massaging my website until that becomes the thing. Money? Like I said, I've got a full time job, and I only work 4 days a week.